DAMARIS LADY MASHAM AN LEIBNIZ

S^r Oates 29 March 1704

Thō I am not in the Number of those who can confirm the advantageous Idea you have of English Ladys yet I have been too much conversant amongst Learned Men not to have contracted (so far as I am capable of it) a Just Value for them or to have been ignorant of the rank you hold in the Commonwealth of Letters. This has dispos'd me long since to entertain with Pleasure any Occasion of testifying a great Respect for you; and has lately suggested to me that my Fathers Intellectual System might, possibly, not be unacceptable to you. The esteem you express for that Work pleases me very much both on this account, and also as it is a new Confirmation to me of the Worth of that Performance.

I should be glad to have a farther view into the Intellectual World; and would therefore willingly have right Conceptions of the System you propose. To this Purpose upon the receit of your obliging Letter, I look'd into the Article of Rorarius in the first Edition of M^r Bayls Dictionarie (not haveing the 2^d by me) and being by his quotation of you there, directed to the Journal des Savans 1695 I read what is there publish'd of it.

Perhaps my not being accustom'd to such abstract Speculations made me not well comprehend what you say there of Formes, upon which I think you build your Hypothesis: for (as it seemes to me) you sometimes call them *Forces Primitives, sometimes ~~des Ames~~* sometimes *Formes constitutives des substances, and sometimes ~~Substances*~~ themselves; but such yet as are neither Spirit, nor matter whence I confess I have no cleare Idea of what you call Formes.

That a man whose Correspondence is so highly esteem'd as yours by all the Learned men of Europe should employ any of his valuable Moments in the instruction of an Ignorant Woman is what I should not perhaps presume to importune you for, if your character was known to me onely as a Learned Man; for those who are far advanced in Learned Studies, and high Speculations may think themselves excus'd from such a Condescention; but you I am confident would not contemne the most Ignorant Lover of Truth; were I not secur'd by my sex of a favorable distinction from the obligeing Civilitie of a Man Conversant in Courts.

I take the libertie therefore to request the favour of you that you will by some explication or definition of them help me to Conceive what your *Formes* are; for I cannot but desire to understand a Systeme recommended to me not onely by the eminence of its Author, but particularly also as tending to inlarge our Idea of the Divine Perfections, and the Beautie of his Works. If you please to add in short the Sum of your Answers to M^r Bayles objections in his second edition of his Dictionarie it will be an Additional Obligation in giveing me still further Light into this matter.

I have order'd my Fathers Discourse concerning the Lords Supper to be sent you together with his Intellectual System in the same vol: the Value you express for the Author makes me think you will not dislike to look into anything of his and thō this Treatise was writ when he was a Young Man, yet it was Highly commended by our Famous Selden.

You will much oblige me in accepting of this Book as from one who is with great Esteem and Respect

S^r Your very Humble Servant Da Masham.

M^r Locke (whose company I am so Happy as to injoy in my Familie) desires me to present you his Humble Service.